<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanotech Car Tint Worth It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/2009/06/nanotech-car-tint-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/2009/06/nanotech-car-tint-worth-it/</link>
	<description>Blog about window tint and window film news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:47:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave C</title>
		<link>http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/2009/06/nanotech-car-tint-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/?p=33#comment-7</guid>
		<description>It blocks approx 90% of IR heat. Bekaert doesn&#039;t publish that performance stat because there&#039;s not an agreed standard on how to publish stats relative to the IR spectrum. Some other IR films are very narrow in the spectrum, Bekaert covers a wide spectrum range with Ultra. The film is incredible and while the stats they publish make it seem like a &quot;normal&quot; performing film at a high price... it is actually a mind-blowing product, I sell it everyday and clients are ecstatic by its abilities. But the press release made it seem lame and pricey for no reason. I see where you were coming from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It blocks approx 90% of IR heat. Bekaert doesn&#8217;t publish that performance stat because there&#8217;s not an agreed standard on how to publish stats relative to the IR spectrum. Some other IR films are very narrow in the spectrum, Bekaert covers a wide spectrum range with Ultra. The film is incredible and while the stats they publish make it seem like a &#8220;normal&#8221; performing film at a high price&#8230; it is actually a mind-blowing product, I sell it everyday and clients are ecstatic by its abilities. But the press release made it seem lame and pricey for no reason. I see where you were coming from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
