<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Static Cling Film vs Regular Window Tint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/2009/08/static-cling-film-vs-regular-window-tint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/2009/08/static-cling-film-vs-regular-window-tint/</link>
	<description>Comprehensive Window Film Guides with Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucette</title>
		<link>http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/2009/08/static-cling-film-vs-regular-window-tint/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/?p=75#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have not been able to find any brand of static-cling window film that is clear (or almost clear) and blocks 99% of UV. They seem to top out at about 90%. Could you please direct me to a brand that is removable, clear, and blocks 99% of UV rays? The less distortion, the better, of course.

I have single pane windows that are probably more than 40 years old, and that have a few cracks. Could I safely install regular (non-cling) film? I am a renter, so cannot replace windows, do not want to damage them further, and would ideally want to be able to remove film when I move out. Also, film should not be noticably tinted. 

Any advice would be much appreciated!

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have not been able to find any brand of static-cling window film that is clear (or almost clear) and blocks 99% of UV. They seem to top out at about 90%. Could you please direct me to a brand that is removable, clear, and blocks 99% of UV rays? The less distortion, the better, of course.</p>
<p>I have single pane windows that are probably more than 40 years old, and that have a few cracks. Could I safely install regular (non-cling) film? I am a renter, so cannot replace windows, do not want to damage them further, and would ideally want to be able to remove film when I move out. Also, film should not be noticably tinted. </p>
<p>Any advice would be much appreciated!</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Custom Tinting</title>
		<link>http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/2009/08/static-cling-film-vs-regular-window-tint/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Custom Tinting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tintcenter.com/blog/?p=75#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Relatively good article, however, a few comments do not hold true. Window film can be cleaned with ammonia based cleaners, but, no cleaner should be allowed to puddle at the edges. 

 Also, Winter performance it no wholly true. Static cling films CAN be removed, however, the amount of heat gain while the sun is lower in the sky is nominal, you are actually not gaining from it, since you are losing  heat through the glass. It also does very little to heat areas that will radiate the heat into the space.(ie. floors, furniture) Couple that with the fact that film provides an insulating value (heat loss reduction can be as high as 10-15%)

Nice topic, but the facts are a little skewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relatively good article, however, a few comments do not hold true. Window film can be cleaned with ammonia based cleaners, but, no cleaner should be allowed to puddle at the edges. </p>
<p> Also, Winter performance it no wholly true. Static cling films CAN be removed, however, the amount of heat gain while the sun is lower in the sky is nominal, you are actually not gaining from it, since you are losing  heat through the glass. It also does very little to heat areas that will radiate the heat into the space.(ie. floors, furniture) Couple that with the fact that film provides an insulating value (heat loss reduction can be as high as 10-15%)</p>
<p>Nice topic, but the facts are a little skewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: www.tintcenter.com @ 2012-02-09 18:40:16 -->
